RATING(of 10): 6.5
You can wait to rent this one.
Monday, July 21, 2008
The Hulk
REVIEW: Not an upgrade at all from the first one. If anything Ang Lee's version was much more visually appealing. The story was good the acting was fine, but the film making is what just ruined it. Ideally you take Norton and Roth, put them in Lee's version and you have the best Hulk movie to date. Instead of a great superhero movie you have an ok action flick.... Oh well, third times a charm?
RATING(of 10): 6.5
You can wait to rent this one.
RATING(of 10): 6.5
You can wait to rent this one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I don't think the rating system of 5 stars is best for you. You need more variation. What about a score out of 100 or something. Hulk is better than Hellboy and Wall-E was better than Hancock. Plus Wall-E and Wanted were much better than Hellboy not just 1/2 star. I'd like to see more variation.
Let me try to say this another way. Take Robert and Ebert - ultimately to tell you whether a movie is worth your time or not. Thumbs up or Down. Very basic. Then you have rotten tomatoes - out of 100% so you can see where movies rank against others. Your 5 star system is in the middle and doesn't really capture the point of either method effectively. I suggest going with something more basic - your own variation of the thumbs up or down, if you just want to get across to see a movie or not, or something more in depth to compare movies to one another.
Just my 2 cents. And seeing as how I am one of three people that visits this page - you might want to take heed to the advice! HAHA alright I'm done hatin.
-Nixon
holy moses - i was thinking the same thing. too much room for movies to get lost in the shuffle
Jeez face, wtf? haha ;)
Chris, I have already thought about that as i was rating these. No worries bro, i am on top of it. And i will use the 10 scale, like IMDB
Hows that sound?
It sounds scrumptulescent.
Post a Comment